Freedom of Communication
|
Status Quo Option: Keep the Existing Plank. For all platform categories
we have the option of doing nothing; that is accepting what the LP already
has.
|
The LP Platform Currently Reads
The Issue: We oppose any abridgment of the freedom of speech
through government censorship, regulation or control of communications media,
including, but not limited to, laws concerning: a) Obscenity, including
"pornography", as we hold this to be an abridgment of liberty of expression
despite claims that it instigates rape or assault, or demeans and slanders
women; b) Reception and storage equipment, such as digital audio tape
recorders and radar warning devices, and the manufacture of video terminals
by telephone companies; c) Electronic bulletin boards, communications
networks, and other interactive electronic media as we hold them to be the
functional equivalent of speaking halls and printing presses in the age of
electronic communications, and as such deserving of full freedom;
d) Electronic newspapers, electronic "Yellow Pages", file libraries, websites,
and other new information media, as these deserve full freedom; or
e) Commercial speech or advertising. We oppose speech codes at all schools
that are primarily tax funded. Language that is deemed offensive to certain
groups is not a cause for legal action. We strongly oppose the government's
burgeoning practice of invading newsrooms, or the premises of other innocent
third parties, in the name of law enforcement. We further oppose court orders
gagging news coverage of criminal proceedings -- the right to publish and
broadcast must not be abridged merely for the convenience of the judicial
system. We deplore any efforts to impose thought control on the media, either
by the use of anti-trust laws, or by any other government action in the
name of stopping "bias."
The Principle: We defend the rights of individuals
to unrestricted freedom of speech, freedom of the press and the right of
individuals to dissent from government itself. We recognize that full freedom
of expression is possible only as part of a system of full property rights.
The freedom to use one's own voice; the freedom to hire a hall; the freedom
to own a printing press, a broadcasting station, or a transmission cable;
the freedom to host and publish information on the Internet; the freedom to
wave or burn one's own flag; and similar property-based freedoms are precisely
what constitute freedom of communication. At the same time, we recognize that
freedom of communication does not extend to the use of other people's property
to promote one's ideas without the voluntary consent of the owners.
Solutions: We would provide for free market
ownership of airwave frequencies, deserving of full First Amendment protection.
We oppose government ownership or subsidy of, or funding for, any communications
organization. Removal of all of these regulations and practices throughout
the communications media would open the way to diversity and innovation.
We shall not be satisfied until the First Amendment is expanded to protect
full, unconditional freedom of communication.
Transitional Action: We advocate the abolition
of the Federal Communications Commission.
[If you think the current LP position on this subject is acceptable, then
vote "yes" below. If not, vote "no" below. Either way, please consider the
other options listed on the right sidebar and vote "yes" for all that you
like and "no" for all that you dislike. This is an approval vote; you get
to vote for all of the options that you like.]
9 Comments (This is also the place for general comments about this plank
vs. comments about particular proposals.)
Printer Friendly Version
Top of Page
|
|
