Military Policy
|
Status Quo Option: Keep the Existing Plank. For all platform categories
we have the option of doing nothing; that is accepting what the LP already
has.
|
The LP Platform Currently Reads
The Issue: The potential use of nuclear
weapons is the greatest threat to all the peoples of the world, not only
Americans. Thus, the objective should be to reduce the risk that a nuclear
war might begin and its scope if it does.
The Principle: Any U.S. military policy
should have the objective of providing security for the lives, liberty and
property of the American people in the U.S. against the risk of attack by
a foreign power. This objective should be achieved as inexpensively as possible
and without undermining the liberties it is designed to protect.
Solutions: U.S. weapons of indiscriminate
mass destruction should be replaced with smaller weapons, aimed solely at
military targets and not designed or targeted to kill millions of civilians.
We call for the replacement of nuclear war fighting policies with a policy
of developing cost-effective defensive systems. Accordingly, we oppose any
future agreement which would prevent defensive systems on U.S. territory or
in Earth orbit.
Transitional Action: We call on the
U.S. government to continue negotiations toward multi-lateral reduction of
nuclear armaments, to the end that all such weapons will ultimately be eliminated,
under such conditions of verification as to ensure multi-lateral security.
During arms reduction negotiations, and to enhance their progress, the U.S.
should begin the retirement of some of its nuclear weapons as proof of its
commitment. Because the U.S. has many more thousands of nuclear weapons than
are currently required, beginning the process of arms reduction would not
jeopardize American security. We call on the U.S. government to remove its
nuclear weapons from Europe. If European countries want nuclear weapons on
their soil, they should take full responsibility for them and pay the cost.
We call for the withdrawal of all American military personnel stationed abroad,
including the countries of NATO Europe, Japan, the Philippines, Central
America and South Korea. There is no current or foreseeable risk of any conventional
military attack on the American people, particularly from long distances.
We call for the withdrawal of the U.S. from commitments to engage in war
on behalf of other governments and for abandonment of doctrines supporting
military intervention such as the Monroe Doctrine.
[If you think the current LP position on this subject is acceptable, then
vote "yes" below. If not, vote "no" below. Either way, please consider the
other options listed on the right sidebar and vote "yes" for all that you
like and "no" for all that you dislike. This is an approval vote; you get
to vote for all of the options that you like.]
2 Comments (This is also the place for general comments about this plank
vs. comments about particular proposals.)
Printer Friendly Version
Top of Page
|