Not logged in

Login

Join

Platform

Based on Old

Intro

Crime

Victimless Crimes

Safeguards for the Criminally Accused

Justice for the Individual

Juries

Individual Sovereignty

Government and Mental Health

The Right to Property

Government Secrecy

Internal Security

Conscription and the Military

Immigration

Freedom of Association and Government Discrimination

Women's Rights and Abortion

Families and Children

Sexual Rights

American Indian Rights

The Economy

Taxation

Inflation and Depression

Finance and Capital Investment

Government Debt

Monopolies

Subsidies

Trade Barriers

Public Utilities

Unions and Collective Bargaining

Energy

Pollution

Consumer Protection

Education

Population

Transportation

Poverty and Unemployment

Health Care

Resource Use

Agriculture

Occupational Safety and Health

Social Security

Postal Service

Civil Service

Election Laws

Secession

Negotiations

International Travel and Foreign Investments

Human Rights

World Government

Military Policy

Presidential War Powers

Foreign Aid

International Money

Unowned Resources

Colonialism

Foreign Intervention

Space Exploration

Omissions

Home Page

Military Policy

Status Quo Option: Keep the Existing Plank. For all platform categories we have the option of doing nothing; that is accepting what the LP already has.

The LP Platform Currently Reads

The Issue: The potential use of nuclear weapons is the greatest threat to all the peoples of the world, not only Americans. Thus, the objective should be to reduce the risk that a nuclear war might begin and its scope if it does.

The Principle: Any U.S. military policy should have the objective of providing security for the lives, liberty and property of the American people in the U.S. against the risk of attack by a foreign power. This objective should be achieved as inexpensively as possible and without undermining the liberties it is designed to protect.

Solutions: U.S. weapons of indiscriminate mass destruction should be replaced with smaller weapons, aimed solely at military targets and not designed or targeted to kill millions of civilians. We call for the replacement of nuclear war fighting policies with a policy of developing cost-effective defensive systems. Accordingly, we oppose any future agreement which would prevent defensive systems on U.S. territory or in Earth orbit.

Transitional Action: We call on the U.S. government to continue negotiations toward multi-lateral reduction of nuclear armaments, to the end that all such weapons will ultimately be eliminated, under such conditions of verification as to ensure multi-lateral security. During arms reduction negotiations, and to enhance their progress, the U.S. should begin the retirement of some of its nuclear weapons as proof of its commitment. Because the U.S. has many more thousands of nuclear weapons than are currently required, beginning the process of arms reduction would not jeopardize American security. We call on the U.S. government to remove its nuclear weapons from Europe. If European countries want nuclear weapons on their soil, they should take full responsibility for them and pay the cost. We call for the withdrawal of all American military personnel stationed abroad, including the countries of NATO Europe, Japan, the Philippines, Central America and South Korea. There is no current or foreseeable risk of any conventional military attack on the American people, particularly from long distances. We call for the withdrawal of the U.S. from commitments to engage in war on behalf of other governments and for abandonment of doctrines supporting military intervention such as the Monroe Doctrine.

[If you think the current LP position on this subject is acceptable, then vote "yes" below. If not, vote "no" below. Either way, please consider the other options listed on the right sidebar and vote "yes" for all that you like and "no" for all that you dislike. This is an approval vote; you get to vote for all of the options that you like.]

2 Comments (This is also the place for general comments about this plank vs. comments about particular proposals.)


Printer Friendly Version
Top of Page

Military Policy

Options

  • Keep the Existing Plank


Any More Proposals?

Proposal Submission Guidelines

(for this plank)