Not logged in

Login

Join

Platform

Based on Old

Intro

Crime

Victimless Crimes

Safeguards for the Criminally Accused

Justice for the Individual

Juries

Individual Sovereignty

Government and Mental Health

The Right to Property

Government Secrecy

Internal Security

Conscription and the Military

Immigration

Freedom of Association and Government Discrimination

Women's Rights and Abortion

Families and Children

Sexual Rights

American Indian Rights

The Economy

Taxation

Inflation and Depression

Finance and Capital Investment

Government Debt

Monopolies

Subsidies

Trade Barriers

Public Utilities

Unions and Collective Bargaining

Energy

Pollution

Consumer Protection

Education

Population

Transportation

Poverty and Unemployment

Health Care

Resource Use

Agriculture

Occupational Safety and Health

Social Security

Postal Service

Civil Service

Election Laws

Secession

Negotiations

International Travel and Foreign Investments

Human Rights

World Government

Military Policy

Presidential War Powers

Foreign Aid

International Money

Unowned Resources

Colonialism

Foreign Intervention

Space Exploration

Omissions

Home Page

Safeguards for the Criminally Accused

Status Quo Option: Keep the Existing Plank. For all platform categories we have the option of doing nothing; that is accepting what the LP already has.

The LP Platform Currently Reads

The Issue: Instant-punishment policies deprive the accused of important checks on government power -- juries and the judicial process.

The Principle: Until such time as persons are proved guilty of crimes, they should be accorded full respect for their individual rights. We oppose any concept that some individuals are by nature second-class citizens who only understand instant punishment and any claim that the police possess special insight into recognizing persons in need of punishment. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused.

Solutions: Cases must no longer be treated as "civil" strictly to avoid the due process protections of criminal law. Government must no longer be allowed to seize property for criminal offenses, prior to civil or criminal proceedings. Full restitution must be made for all loss suffered by persons arrested, indicted, tried, imprisoned, or otherwise injured in the course of criminal proceedings against them that do not result in their conviction. When they are responsible, government police employees or agents must be liable for this restitution.

Transitional Action: Police officers must be prohibited from using excessive force on the disorderly or the criminally accused, handing out what they may consider to be instant punishments on the streets, or using preventive detention and no-knock laws. The judicial system must be reformed to allow criminal defendants and civil parties to a court action a reasonable number of peremptory challenges to proposed judges, similar to their right under the present system to challenge a proposed juror.

[If you think the current LP position on this subject is acceptable, then vote "yes" below. If not, vote "no" below. Either way, please consider the other options listed on the right sidebar and vote "yes" for all that you like and "no" for all that you dislike. This is an approval vote; you get to vote for all of the options that you like.]

2 Comments (This is also the place for general comments about this plank vs. comments about particular proposals.)


Printer Friendly Version
Top of Page

Safeguards for the Criminally Accused

Options

  • Keep the Existing Plank


Any More Proposals?

Proposal Submission Guidelines

(for this plank)